City council missed an opportunity to fight blight

Recently, the city council had a chance to help ensure the prevention of housing blight.
It was just one tool that the city could use, but the council decided to remain silent on the matter, which in its own way spoke volumes.
At issue was a proposal by the city administration – through the city’s manager’s office – to require homeowners to have inspections of their properties before selling them.
The argument for the proposal was that a number of houses change hands in cash-only deals, and that often means there is no inspection performed.
A number of people are satisfied with purchasing a house without getting an inspection. That is rolling the dice.
By requiring an inspection, the argument goes, homeowners are forced to make needed improvements before selling their homes.
It’s a win for the purchaser — and the city.
Why a win for the city?
Because the city can halt the ongoing issue of bad houses being sold to other persons.
Those opposed say that it’s up to the buyer to do an inspection, if they opt to.
Guess what?
Just about no one does that if they aren’t required to.
You may think it’s overreach for the city to demand an inspection, but had this proposal gone through, it would have created a major hurdle for slumlords.
The council, instead of discussing the proposal, chose to drop the matter entirely.
Consider this an opportunity lost for helping to ensure the health and safety of Hamtramckans. The council’s inaction is a signal to slumlords to carry on — because we don’t care.
Posted Sept. 24, 2021

One Response to City council missed an opportunity to fight blight

  1. Nasr Hussain

    September 26, 2021 at 12:26 pm

    Before that I think the City of Hamtramck should pass an ordinance to charge a fee and perform a check on every vehicle a resident purchases to make sure he/she does the necessary repairs before he’s allowed to drive it in the city. Automobiles are much more mobile objects and can easily lead to accidents and more deaths in the city if they’re in a bad condition. This “big brother” mentality should be stopped especially if it’s used to line the pockets of a private company that benefits from these un-necessary inspections and permits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *